Merge pull request #89675 from dalexeev/gds-correct-unused-signal-warning

GDScript: Do not produce `UNUSED_SIGNAL` warning for common implicit uses
This commit is contained in:
Rémi Verschelde
2024-09-05 18:34:45 +02:00
3 changed files with 63 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -1,12 +1,29 @@
signal s1()
signal s2()
signal s3()
# Doesn't produce the warning:
signal used_as_first_class_signal()
signal used_with_signal_constructor()
signal used_with_signal_emit()
signal used_with_object_emit_signal()
signal used_with_object_connect()
signal used_with_object_disconnect()
signal used_with_self_prefix()
# Produce the warning:
signal used_with_dynamic_name()
signal just_unused()
@warning_ignore("unused_signal")
signal s4()
signal unused_but_ignored()
func no_exec():
s1.emit()
print(s2)
print(used_as_first_class_signal)
print(Signal(self, "used_with_signal_constructor"))
used_with_signal_emit.emit()
print(emit_signal("used_with_object_emit_signal"))
print(connect("used_with_object_connect", Callable()))
disconnect("used_with_object_disconnect", Callable())
print(self.emit_signal("used_with_self_prefix"))
var dynamic_name := "used_with_dynamic_name"
print(emit_signal(dynamic_name))
func test():
pass

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
GDTEST_OK
>> WARNING
>> Line: 3
>> Line: 11
>> UNUSED_SIGNAL
>> The signal "s3" is declared but never explicitly used in the class.
>> The signal "used_with_dynamic_name" is declared but never explicitly used in the class.
>> WARNING
>> Line: 12
>> UNUSED_SIGNAL
>> The signal "just_unused" is declared but never explicitly used in the class.